 |
The Public Opinion Soapbox Welcome to the Public Opinion's community message board. You must be registered to post, and all posts are subject to moderation by our staff.
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
faeryedark
Joined: 22 Oct 2007 Posts: 22
|
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 9:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Yeah, I really love the National Treasure movies. But then, I'm a history buff...drove my kids crazy cause I figured out most of the clues before the characters |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZiggyStardust
Joined: 07 Nov 2007 Posts: 55 Location: Chambersburg
|
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Saw "Juno" a couple of weeks ago...it was really, really good. Apparently even the Christian Coalition thought it was good, and it deals with teen pregnancy!
Anyway...good movie. Lots of witty banter and it ends nicely, too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anonymous_coward

Joined: 24 Oct 2007 Posts: 534
|
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| to each their own, but I couldn't stand national treasure. i thought it was predictable, derivative (of davinci code, which I refuse to read because I'm sure it's equally predictable, derivative, and corny) and corny, and then someone made a worse movie and called it sahara. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Coppy

Joined: 28 Oct 2007 Posts: 2417 Location: Chambersburg
|
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The first National Treasure movie left me snoozing; it was so awful. I couldn't possibly bear to even consider the sequel. I will say that those movies have nothing to do with history.
The Da Vinci Code book was a much better read than it was a film. You're absolutely right, the movie was corny, dumb and predictable. Possibly the worst performance of Tom Hank's career (including Bachelor Party and The Money Pit). Plus Ron Howard made it more universal by glossing over anything controversial. The books not as great as some people think, but it's considerably better than the movie.
As for Juno, I can't wait to see this but I may just wait until DVD since comedies rarely translate better at the theater than at home. Still holding out for There Will Be Blood. Doubt it will ever play around here though (other than Carlisle Theater).
Finally, I'm going to see Cloverfield if for no other reason than to see something original. The first-person POV is different and we don't have enough movies that try something new these days. Despite most people telling me to avoid and critics being split on the whole thing, I think I can handle it.
The reports that it actually made some people throw up makes it that much more enticing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
armed_citizen

Joined: 27 Oct 2007 Posts: 226 Location: Chambersburg, PA
|
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree that Cloverfield looks intriguing, though I'll wait for the video. A film my wife and I saw a little while ago was "No Country For Old Men." This one is hard to review. You'll either understand what I'm saying or you won't:
I think this movie was very well-made, but did not find it at all 'entertaining'. I left the theater with a truly dark cold feeling inside. I give the Coen brothers credit because I think that's what they were going for. I certainly couldn't sit through a movie like this every week. So if it makes sense, I thought it was excellently done, even if I found it disturbing on a personal level.
Hope that makes sense.  _________________ Author assumes full responsibility for the content of their posts. Opinions expressed on this website are not necessarily those of the Public Opinion, its editor, publisher, Board or affiliated parties. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cookieclaygirl

Joined: 03 Dec 2007 Posts: 1963 Location: shippensburg
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cloverfield looks really good. a friend of mine saw juno and really liked it. i'd like to see that.
never saw the national treasure ones...i bought the dvd cheap and it skipped. i was too lazy to return it. lol... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Coppy

Joined: 28 Oct 2007 Posts: 2417 Location: Chambersburg
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is probably my fifth review of No Country For Old Men here, but here it goes; I loved everything about it. It's what more movies should try to be. And yes, it was the kind of movie that leaves you with a cold feeling. The ending was very un-Hollywood and makes you leave the theater thinking about it.
I only wish I could sit through a movie like that every week; maybe I'm a bit morbid, but the fact that films like this come along so rarely makes them that much better I guess. I still love a good comedy and even a mindless action flick. But you can't beat something like "No Country."
So yeah, it makes sense. The film was disturbing. And Chigur (sp?) rivals Hannibal Lector as one of the greatest movie villains ever. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
faeryedark
Joined: 22 Oct 2007 Posts: 22
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| anonymous_coward wrote: | | to each their own, but I couldn't stand national treasure. i thought it was predictable, derivative (of davinci code, which I refuse to read because I'm sure it's equally predictable, derivative, and corny) and corny, and then someone made a worse movie and called it sahara. |
Actually, Sahara the book was awesome. I love pretty much all of Clive Cussler's books...but the movie sucked big time...probably because it din't stick in the least to the book and they completely ommitted the surprise ending. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anonymous_coward

Joined: 24 Oct 2007 Posts: 534
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Coppy wrote: | This is probably my fifth review of No Country For Old Men here, but here it goes; I loved everything about it. It's what more movies should try to be. And yes, it was the kind of movie that leaves you with a cold feeling. The ending was very un-Hollywood and makes you leave the theater thinking about it.
I only wish I could sit through a movie like that every week; maybe I'm a bit morbid, but the fact that films like this come along so rarely makes them that much better I guess. I still love a good comedy and even a mindless action flick. But you can't beat something like "No Country."
So yeah, it makes sense. The film was disturbing. And Chigur (sp?) rivals Hannibal Lector as one of the greatest movie villains ever. |
NOTE, MONSTER PLOT SPOILERS
The dark feeling is the point of the movie. My favorite scene is when Chigurh confronts Lewelyn's wife. The hypocrisy of blaming fate (the coin) for her death, while obviously he has been a sociopath who shouldn't care about making such decisions is unavoidable. Likewise Ed Tom's lamenting about how his country has changed because of the drug trade into a violent, bleak world, ignores it's earlier bloody past, and contradicts the earlier hypocrisy of fate. The abruptness of Lewelyn's death, both in the book and the movie, speak to how he never had a chance against a force that overwhelmed him, even though we wanted to think he did, and is a metaphor for our chances against the violence and darkness in the world.
The movie is literally dripping with metaphor. When I, the antithesis of an English major can recognize it, it must be intense, but it was done in a very thoughtful way.
When we were leaving the theater upon seeing the movie, my girlfriend heard a couple complaining about how they were expecting, "Moss to kick some ***." I can't believe that they would rather have that, than the though provoking meaning of the movie. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tele
Joined: 28 Jan 2008 Posts: 48 Location: Chambersburg
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It's not a recent movie, but I thought Breach was very good. I love movies based on true stories. Rescue Dawn is another movie that I think is underated. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Coppy

Joined: 28 Oct 2007 Posts: 2417 Location: Chambersburg
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| anonymous_coward wrote: |
When we were leaving the theater upon seeing the movie, my girlfriend heard a couple complaining about how they were expecting, "Moss to kick some ***." I can't believe that they would rather have that, than the though provoking meaning of the movie. |
This was the most disappointing thing I've heard people say about this movie, or that they didn't like the ending or thought it could have ended better. It's so crazy to think that the Coen's could have changed something about the 3rd act to make it "better." I think you summed it up perfectly:
| anonymous_coward wrote: | | The abruptness of Lewelyn's death, both in the book and the movie, speak to how he never had a chance against a force that overwhelmed him, even though we wanted to think he did, and is a metaphor for our chances against the violence and darkness in the world. |
It was like the themes of the movie were their own character, and the mistake people made was assuming that Moss was the main character; good guy vs. bad guy; moss vs. chigurh. But that wasn't it at all, and if anyone was the film's antagonist, it was Ed Tom... but only to really show that hypocrisy of fate.
Awesome thoughts AC, thanks for that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|