The Public Opinion Soapbox Forum Index The Public Opinion Soapbox
Welcome to the Public Opinion's community message board. You must be registered to post, and all posts are subject to moderation by our staff.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Presidential election
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    The Public Opinion Soapbox Forum Index -> Best of the Forums
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bobo



Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 173
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 3:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Coppy, the answer to your question is that the Evangelicals (and other so-called christians) will never vote for a Democrat - NEVER. I truly don't think someone not believing in evolution is a negative for these people. In fact, it's probably a plus.

As for Huckabee, please read on from this AP story from 12/08:

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. - Mike Huckabee once advocated isolating AIDS patients from the general public, opposed increased federal funding in the search for a cure and said homosexuality could "pose a dangerous public health risk."

As a candidate for a U.S. Senate seat in 1992, Huckabee answered 229 questions submitted to him by The Associated Press. Besides a quarantine, Huckabee suggested that Hollywood celebrities fund AIDS research from their own pockets, rather than federal health agencies.


HOWEVER, the article went on to state ... When Huckabee wrote his answers in 1992, it was common knowledge that AIDS could not be spread by casual contact. In late 1991, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said there were 195,718 AIDS patients in the country and that 126,159 people had died from the syndrome.

FURTHER, another paragraph from the article: Also in the wide-ranging AP questionnaire in 1992, Huckabee said, "I feel homosexuality is an aberrant, unnatural, and sinful lifestyle, and we now know it can pose a dangerous public health risk."

AND FINALLY ... A Southern Baptist preacher, Huckabee has been a favorite among social conservatives for his vocal opposition to gay marriage. In 2003, Huckabee said that the U.S. Supreme Court was probably right to strike down anti-sodomy laws, but that states still should be able to restrict things such as gay marriage or domestic partner benefits.



If this guy gets elected, or Romney, seriously, I'm moving to Canada.
_________________
The sun, the moon and the stars would have disappeared long ago... had they happened to be within the reach of predatory human hands. ~Havelock Ellis, The Dance of Life, 1923
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
.45chel



Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 2749
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 1:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, Huckabee's stance on HIV & AIDS is pretty...SAD, UGLY, DISTASTEFUL...Unfortunate.

I found Senator Bill Frist's comments even worse considering the medical background he likes to cram down your throat ("I'm a doctor!")

He said (on television, no less) that you could get AIDS from sweat, saliva (it would take over a gallon before traces of the virus are even...oh forget it. >gag<) and toilet seats. Uh, WHAT?! Confused

And, yes, Bobo you are absolutely right. There are some evangelicals that will never vote for a Dem. It's not just evangelicals though.


Don't forget Huckabee's belief that a wife should submit graciously to serving her husband...heh.

Yeah, there women out there that believe that too, but the ones that don't are more fun!
Wink
_________________
I demand euphoria!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
AnonyMouse



Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 405

PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I remember all the Hollywood types saying that they would move to Canada is Bush was re-elected. Did any of them actually do that?

It often feels like things can't get any worse in the way this country is run, but then I read about Guiliani and all his shady dealings, secrecy, coverups, and sleazy associates and I realize that a Guiliani administration would be exponentially worse than what we have. I think that if any of the other Repubs get elected, it will be more of the same, but Guiliani would really wreck things.

Oh, and 'chel, I love the new signature line!
Quote:
May the road rise up to meet you... right square in the face!

Awesome!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jo



Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 94
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Submit graciously, ouch. What a concept! What is this the Dark Ages? C'mon now. Talk about taking Biblical doctrine out of context.

Fact is, I don't see anyone I want in charge yet. Honestly, give me a way out there Steve Forbes or Ross Perot to at least think about! Hell, I'd even go for Oscar the Grouch at this point!
_________________
Me thinks that the moment my legs begin to move, my thoughts begin to flow. ~ Henry David Thoreau on hiking
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
.45chel



Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 2749
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

AnonyMouse wrote:

Oh, and 'chel, I love the new signature line!
Quote:
May the road rise up to meet you... right square in the face!

Awesome!


Thank you.

It's my attempt at Christmas spirit. Very Happy
_________________
I demand euphoria!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
.45chel



Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 2749
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jo wrote:
Hell, I'd even go for Oscar the Grouch at this point!


Oscar would be one of my first choices. He was one of the few good characters on Sesame Street. (I'm a Muppet Show kinda person) How I hated Big Bird!



On a slightly more serious note, out of the current candidates I know who I'm leaning toward at the moment, but I can't help but wish *she* would have some real competition.
_________________
I demand euphoria!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Bobo



Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 173
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 2:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chel wrote: On a slightly more serious note, out of the current candidates I know who I'm leaning toward at the moment, but I can't help but wish *she* would have some real competition.

Yippee Chel!!! I'm liking you more each day. Wink

For myself, I'm more than leaning that way. I just hope the general societal misogyny (ala Cheryl Stearn) doesn't make her unelectable. I'm not terribly optimistic. Our society, sadly, seems less enlightened that a lot of the rest of the world.

I feel I know you, Chel. Your initials aren't SB are they?
_________________
The sun, the moon and the stars would have disappeared long ago... had they happened to be within the reach of predatory human hands. ~Havelock Ellis, The Dance of Life, 1923
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AnonyMouse



Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 405

PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 2:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's something to think about for all the Hillary fans out there.

Quote:
Hillary Clinton Might Be the Least Electable Democrat
Guy T. Saperstein is past president of the Sierra Club Foundation; previously, he was one of the National Law Journal's "100 Most Influential Lawyers in America."


Quote:
Another factor to consider is the power of Clinton to unify the opposition. While the field of Republican candidates is uninspiring, if not grim, Clinton is a galvanizing force for conservatives. While Clinton-hatred may be unfair (I happen to think it is), the intensity of animosity conservatives have reserved for the Clintons is unprecedented. They want to run against her not only because she may be the weakest candidate, but also because they hate her and what they think she stands for. I am not endorsing this hatred, which I consider irrational and destructive, but Democrats need to consider that her candidacy, more than any other Democratic candidate, has the potential to motivate and activate the opposition.


Whatever else she may have going for her, the irrationality and depth of the Hillary-hatred will galvinize and motivate the Repubs in a way that will absolutely guarantee that the Democrats won't get the White House.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/guy-t-saperstein/hillary-clinton-might-be-_b_76162.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bobo



Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 173
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 6:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mouse, I think that very well may be true. But to that I would say, all of you Democrats and others, including Republicans, who don't want a religious state and a continuing erosion of personal freedoms: If you allow the Right to hijack the election because some have an irrational hatred of Hilary Clinton, you deserve what you get.

Unfortunately, the rest of us will have to live with it too.
_________________
The sun, the moon and the stars would have disappeared long ago... had they happened to be within the reach of predatory human hands. ~Havelock Ellis, The Dance of Life, 1923
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
.45chel



Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 2749
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 4:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bobo wrote:

I feel I know you, Chel. Your initials aren't SB are they?


Afraid not. But you may still know me. >insert creepy laugh<



Mouse,

I realize there are Clinton haters out there, but, for the most part, their reasons seem unfounded. I would like to think that people will take the time to actually find out where she stands on the issues rather than listen to haters or go on prejudgments. It is our country on the line, afterall!

I know I am probably expecting too much.
It seems I'm either too optimistic or completely jaded and nowhere in between.
Just once, I'd like to see a majority decide that party be damned, they're going to really vote for who's best for America and not just themselves.


As for the current candidates, this is what I'm looking for, in no particular order:

I don't think any American citizen should be discriminated against or have less rights because of their race, religion (or lack thereof), gender or sexual preference (ya know, all that stuff we can't control, with the exception being religion, which is debatable).

I want Roe v. Wade to stand.

I want a better solution to the health care crisis than use your life savings, Medicaid, Medicare or do without.

I've paid into Social Security. Either give me a refund or promise me it, or something better, will be there when I, and anyone else who has paid into it, retire.

There is more to education than standardized test. Let's promote education and make it a little easier for everyone to have access to a decent one if they want it.

Stop pissing on me and telling me it's raining! The creation of more minimum wage jobs does not help anyone. Promote the creation of some real jobs for the people!

You can't legislate morality. Get your religion out of my government!

I want a leader who believes in having a strong defense, but knows that there are times when diplomacy is best.

I want our soldiers and veterans' benefits protected. I want their care to improve and the appreciation that all politician's say they have for them, to show in ways other than a yellow doggone ribbon.

I want a government that looks out for the little guys first and then works it's way up to the fat cats.

I want the tax cuts for the oil companies repealed.

I want to let Iraq stand on its own, let it's citizens decide the fate of their country.

Strengthen the criminal justice system by looking at psychological studies on rehabilitation and reinforcement (positive and negative). Punishments should be swift and severe. Currently, it is neither. *Can we also take a look at some of the stuff we're prosecuting right now?

I want fiscal responsibility from all government officals.

I want government employees held accountable for their ineptitudes and malfeasances.

I want a candidate who can really work with members of the other party.

Please review our thread discussing illegal immigrants for a solution to that problem. Smile


Of course, that's not all I want, but it is most of the important stuff.
As I'm sure you've noticed, quite a few of my criteria leave out the Republican candidates. It's not on purpose, it's just issues I hold dear. I don't see why we can't just let people be. Don't mess with me and I won't mess with you.

I'm looking for a moderate with some common sense and a knowledge of how things work. So far, Hillary fits the bill.
_________________
I demand euphoria!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Jo



Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 94
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 7:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow! What a list!

Chel, that is quite an impressive roster of requirements. Politicans couldn't get all that done if the President, House and Senate were all from the same party and all getting along.

Don't mean to burst your bubble, but heck, look just seeing the lovely post about the Christmas resolution makes me lose faith in the system. At least, what little faith I had left.

Well thought out post though - have you considered running? Wink
_________________
Me thinks that the moment my legs begin to move, my thoughts begin to flow. ~ Henry David Thoreau on hiking
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
.45chel



Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 2749
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 8:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jo wrote:
Wow! What a list!

Chel, that is quite an impressive roster of requirements. Politicans couldn't get all that done if the President, House and Senate were all from the same party and all getting along.


We expect too little of our politicians.

They could at least get started on them, right?

I think we should all have an idea of what is important to us, what we are willing to sacrifice and do without. Then we could send copies to our representatives checking off what they've done or are working on and add a list of things we think they've wasted our money on. Let them know we're watching! Smile

Jo wrote:

Don't mean to burst your bubble, but heck, look just seeing the lovely post about the Christmas resolution makes me lose faith in the system. At least, what little faith I had left.


I often say that I put my faith in mankind--and my faith is tested every day! I believe, I hope, that most politicians do what they do because they want to help. Maybe they got corrupted along the way, but that isn't why they started out. Same with firefighters, law enforcement and such. There was a willingness to sacrifice for the greater good...
Did I mention I enjoy the movie 'Mr. Smith goes to Washington'?
It is one of the few things I still have a bit of naivete about.

Jo wrote:

Well thought out post though - have you considered running? Wink

Not enough education from the wrong kind of schools. Not enough money. No connections. Way too many skeletons. Cool
Oh and I never go to church. Not anti-christian as much as anti-organized religion.
Give me a Mr. Smith though and I'll work my butt off.
_________________
I demand euphoria!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Bobo



Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 173
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 2:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chel could never get elected in the U.S.A., Jo. She's too smart and her positions make too much sense!!!!
_________________
The sun, the moon and the stars would have disappeared long ago... had they happened to be within the reach of predatory human hands. ~Havelock Ellis, The Dance of Life, 1923
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cookieclaygirl



Joined: 03 Dec 2007
Posts: 1798
Location: shippensburg

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 7:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jumping in a bit late, i know, but one thing that's been bothering me, politically speaking, is the 'us them' stance from years of evolution. perhaps the bipartisanship of our country's earlier days were all well and good, but perhaps now this division is hurting us.

i agree with an earlier post. our government could use some serious reform.

one thing that stuck in my head, was a while ago when i saw sicko (please, no liberal jokes--i get the on other forums...i'm just stating my POV) was that the one person in the documentary said that they thought the fundamental difference between their government and america's is that in their country, the government is afraid of the people and in america, the people are afraid of the government.

i think sometimes i feel as though my voice doesn't matter...and i'm sure i'm not alone.

we need reformation. things can't always be set in stone---esp. when the times, they are a-changin'.....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dave



Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 162

PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can agree with every point lsted by .chel. I might add a few.

Is Hillary the one?

1) She continues to take money from special interets.
2) Will there be a bipartin effort? Republicans will fight her tooth & nail. Will it be the same crap today but with a Democrat in charge?
3) Her vote on the Iran guard thing was just stupid. She learned nothing from the Iraq war vote.
4) Since 2000, she has drifted toward the right - positioning, positioning, positioning. (a statement about positioning and not her new beliefs)

Don't get me wrong, I would vote Hillary over Rudy, Fred, Mitt, Hucklebee, McCain (did I miss any Republicans?).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    The Public Opinion Soapbox Forum Index -> Best of the Forums All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Page 2 of 10

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group. Hosted by phpBB.BizHat.com

Free Web Hosting | Free Forum Hosting | Photo Gallery | FreeMarriage.com

Powered by PhpBB.BizHat.com, setup your forum now!
For Support, visit Forums.BizHat.com