| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
.45chel

Joined: 26 Oct 2007 Posts: 3068 Location: Chambersburg
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 3:52 am Post subject: Poll: Santorum for governor? |
|
|
Should former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum run for governor?
Is this a joke?!
Hmmmm... How many different ways can I say NO?! _________________ Nevermind. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dave
Joined: 22 Oct 2007 Posts: 162
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Please, I just ate.
Run him if you want to keep a Democrat as governor. The Republicans ran Swan last time - this would be worse. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Coppy

Joined: 28 Oct 2007 Posts: 2615 Location: Chambersburg
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow! He's seriously considering this after the absolute whooping he took in the Senate race? He was the poster boy for "our country needs a new direction--away from Republicans." It was because of his ridiculous comments about families, and gays, and women and weapons of mass destruction that turned him into a laughingstock to anyone but the most hard-core conservatives. He couldn't win his home town at this point, let alone Philly/Pitt in an election... in fact, the only county he'd probably win, is Franklin.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
.45chel

Joined: 26 Oct 2007 Posts: 3068 Location: Chambersburg
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 6:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
At 5:53 p.m. He's received approximately 35% of the votes, so apparently he can't even win in Franklin...or at least with those of us who use the online polling (I'd like to think we are superior in intellect and charm!)
What disturbs me is the 54 who voted for him. Why? Seriously, someone tell me how he could get votes beyond those given to him by a straight party ticket.
Any of his supporters, please come forward. I'll be honest, You aren't going to change my mind about him, but I would like to hear your opinion and I promise not to name call! _________________ Nevermind. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
me
Joined: 22 Oct 2007 Posts: 119
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 6:58 pm Post subject: WHAT????????? |
|
|
| Now that's the funiest thing I've heard all weekend AND also the most sickening too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bobo
Joined: 22 Oct 2007 Posts: 173 Location: Chambersburg
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Santorum is a joke, but I would be willing to bet $50 that he could win Franklin County. This is where we live, people.
And Chel, it is Bobo - not Bob-o.  _________________ The sun, the moon and the stars would have disappeared long ago... had they happened to be within the reach of predatory human hands. ~Havelock Ellis, The Dance of Life, 1923 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
.45chel

Joined: 26 Oct 2007 Posts: 3068 Location: Chambersburg
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bobo wrote: |
And Chel, it is Bobo - not Bob-o.  |
Thank you. I will correct the pronunciation in my head.
| Bobo wrote: | | Santorum is a joke, but I would be willing to bet $50 that he could win Franklin County. This is where we live, people. |
As for this being where we live, maybe it's time to take it back. Not as Dems or GOPpies, but as clearheaded, thinking individuals. _________________ Nevermind. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
.45chel

Joined: 26 Oct 2007 Posts: 3068 Location: Chambersburg
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Now he is only at 29.41% but MORE people have voted for him.
I can tell I've been up way too long, because I'm starting to get cranky...Who ARE these people?! What is their average I.Q.? Anonymouse said once 'they' were too paranoid to register here, but I know they read the threads. I can seeeeee you!! Either explain yourself or get some doggone sense!!
I'm not referring to Republicans either. Apparently, there is a strong population of retards posing as GOPpies...maybe voting shouldn't be an automatic thing...  _________________ Nevermind. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dave
Joined: 22 Oct 2007 Posts: 162
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
His support comes from those who only care about the following issues:
1) Pro Life
2) Anti gay marriage
All else is irrelevant. To these people a ticket of Santorum & Ann Coulter would be their dream come true.
The really scarey part is that there are people like this. The one guy who heads one of the Christian conservative groups stated that he will not vote for a candidate that is not pro-life.
I can see these social issues as being a factor. But to make them number one is dangerous. What good is their pro-life effort if the country goes to pot.
To me, I say this to those agaist gay marriage: If your marriage is somehow affected by what two people, you don't know, do, then the problem is with your marriage.
If you are going to vote solely to protect the unborn, how about helping protect children after their birth. I.E. quit opposing programs like S-chip, head start, food stamps, etc.
It is so sad that those who announce their Christianity can act so un-christian. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anonymous_coward

Joined: 24 Oct 2007 Posts: 564
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| who's the guy who rights the love column on the onion? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
.45chel

Joined: 26 Oct 2007 Posts: 3068 Location: Chambersburg
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dave, you do the GOPpies good.
The people at the Totem Pole....maybe not so much.
So what were the final numbers so I can cry myself to sleep? _________________ Nevermind. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
armed_citizen

Joined: 27 Oct 2007 Posts: 233 Location: Chambersburg, PA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Agree or disagree with his stance on specific issues, the one thing you have to give him credit for is clearly stating his beliefs, and not twisting his words to appeal to whatever group he's in front of at the time. In this respect, I think all politicians on both sides of the aisle could benefit from his example.
I have more respect for someone who clearly opposes me on an issue, and says so, than someone who can't commit to a position and tries to please everyone. _________________ Author assumes full responsibility for the content of their posts. Opinions expressed on this website are not necessarily those of the Public Opinion, its editor, publisher, Board or affiliated parties. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
.45chel

Joined: 26 Oct 2007 Posts: 3068 Location: Chambersburg
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| armed_citizen wrote: | Agree or disagree with his stance on specific issues, the one thing you have to give him credit for is clearly stating his beliefs...
I have more respect for someone who clearly opposes me on an issue, and says so, than someone who can't commit to a position and tries to please everyone. |
He clearly states his beliefs but that doesn't make him any less wrong. I've met crazy people who can clearly state their position on why people with dark colored hair must die, but that doesn't mean they should hold office.
I don't have a problem with people reviewing the facts or opposing positions and then changing their mind. I think it is ridiculous to stubbornly hold to a failed plan just to keep from being called a 'flip-flopper'. There are worse things than being called names. _________________ Nevermind. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
armed_citizen

Joined: 27 Oct 2007 Posts: 233 Location: Chambersburg, PA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| .45chel wrote: |
He clearly states his beliefs but that doesn't make him any less wrong. I've met crazy people who can clearly state their position on why people with dark colored hair must die, but that doesn't mean they should hold office.
|
But you're in a good position to decide whether or not you wish to vote for him, because he doesn't hide behind a smokescreen.
| .45chel wrote: |
I don't have a problem with people reviewing the facts or opposing positions and then changing their mind. I think it is ridiculous to stubbornly hold to a failed plan just to keep from being called a 'flip-flopper'. There are worse things than being called names. |
Agreed. Bottom line for me is that you should be true to your own beliefs. If that means a stated change on an issue, explain to me what convinced you....maybe I'll agree. But if you haven't wavered, don't pretend you did just to further your campaign. _________________ Author assumes full responsibility for the content of their posts. Opinions expressed on this website are not necessarily those of the Public Opinion, its editor, publisher, Board or affiliated parties. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
.45chel

Joined: 26 Oct 2007 Posts: 3068 Location: Chambersburg
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
armed_citizen
Well, gee, I do believe we're in agreement! (Again!)
Don't get me wrong, those heated 'discussions' on Haloscan are entertaining and they certainly get the blood pumping, but I'm really enjoying these threads. I feel like we're actually accomplishing something here. We aren't changing the world or anything, but we've got people with differing opinions communicating with each other....
Crap, P.O. you turned me into a hippie!! _________________ Nevermind. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|