The Public Opinion Soapbox Forum Index The Public Opinion Soapbox
Welcome to the Public Opinion's community message board. You must be registered to post, and all posts are subject to moderation by our staff.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Dish, Direct, Comcast.....over the air?
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Public Opinion Soapbox Forum Index -> Technology
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Did you know that



Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:19 am    Post subject: Dish, Direct, Comcast.....over the air? Reply with quote

Forget about world peace and saving the planet for just a moment, because I am facing a real dilema to bring in the new year.....I have a new HD tv and can't decide which tv service to go with.

Dish Network claims it has "the best sports and movies in HD with an HD DVR that's better than Tivo and Directv's."

DIRECTV claims to have "the best national HD channels in the known universe."

Comcast doesn't seem to have any great HD claims.

Does anyone have any opinion on which is the best choice concerning HD programming as well as overall programming?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Coppy



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Posts: 2617
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

We've talked about this before, but here's my take.

I bought an HDTV this past summer. I've wanted desperately to get DISH or DirecTV (and, for the record, from experience talking to other HDTV owners, DirecTV is better). However, I can't drop Comcast. I literally can't. You see, TV, phone and Internet providers are like a cult. And what this cult does is bundles services so that, given your situation, you CANNOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE have any choice whatsoever as a consumer.

Case in point. I don't have land line service. I'm young, free, independent. I have a cell phone. Everyone I know has my cell number. Getting a land line phone at this point in my life would be idiotic. So, no land line.

I also absolutely need broadband Internet. If you don't need broadband Internet access, then you're about 10 years behind life and humanity. I need to have high speed access for uploading, downloading, media, news, information and the plethora of other services I receive online. So there's that.

So, here you go. Comcast charges me about 40 buck a month for high speed, cable Internet because I'm also a cable TV subscriber (including their AWFUL lineup of HD channels). If I drop Comcast for satellite, that Charges goes up to about 60 bucks a month.

Ah, so what if I get DirecTV AND DSL? Well, if I get DSL, I am literally FORCED to get a landline. DSL is slower than cable internet, but also cheaper. However, to get DSL, i need to pay Embarq for phone service (which I would NEVER use) making it more expensive than cable Internet at nearly 1/2 the speed.

Verizon is offering Fiber Optic internet to customers now; it's cheaper than cable and almost 10 times faster. But, since we live in RURAL STUPID STINKING WORTHLESSVILLE WHERE NO ONE WILL USE HIGH SPEED INTERNET AND WE'RE STUCK WITH WORTHLESS EMBARQ FOR OUR PHONE COVEREAGE, well, you get the point, we'll never, ever, ever, ever, ever have high speed internet alternatives to cable or DSL available to us ever in a million years.

OK, so lets say you're on dial-up Internet and you could care less about your Internet speed... too bad. If you don't get decent, broadband Internet access now, you'll need it later and if you're locked into a long term satellite contract, you'll pay out the nose for it.

DSL is also a dying technology; but once fiber takes over, people like us int he middle of nowhere will still be stuck with crappy copper wire for Internet service.

So, here's the rundown on HD:

DirecTV is best, but no option for Internet

Dish is second, but no option for Internet

Comcast is third, however, their HD lineup is "reported" to be improving and their Internet access the best you can get in the area.

Land line phone service is dead. Get a family-share cellular phone plan and ditch your landline phone altogether. Even VOIP isn't worth it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
.45chel



Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 3068
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 2:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tell us how you really feel.

I'm holding out for a better option than Comcast. 'Course, I'm a dinosaur with a landline.
_________________
Nevermind.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Did you know that



Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 2:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I heard recently heard about some folks in (Perry county I think) got together and signed petitions to get high speed internet into their small town. I understand that this was just for DSL service (talk about behind the times), but maybe it could be applied in the instance of trying to get fiber optics into the area. I am in exactly the same situation as you.

I have Embarq because I have to have it for high speed internet. I never use my home phone, so basically I am paying ($30+) for the phone and ($24.95) for the internet...that's $60 a month for internet.

I actually just found out that I can't even get comcast. I can only get Kuhncom. Oh boy![/u]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Coppy



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Posts: 2617
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 3:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are a lot of people in this country that live in such rural areas, they don't have access to DSL OR Cable Internet.

The reason behind this is simple economics; why should the phone or cable company run lines to an area where not enough people will pay to use the service?

It goes back to when Congress mandated that people in rural areas must have phone service and subsidized the running of lines to rural areas. Geez, you people up in McConnellsburg may not have phone service to this day if it wasn't for that. But the argument is that, unlike phone service, the Internet is a luxury and one only afforded to areas where people will pay. Good luck if you ever want to take an online college course or start an online business.

But the copper lines running around here don't necessarily facilitate DSL service and if cable isn't available, you're out of luck.

I strongly believe that broadband Internet service, in this day and age, is an absolute necessity and that ever household should have access to it. If it means the government subsidizing our taxes to make it happen, I would support that 1000%. Imagine how many people could have reasonably priced, broadband (high speed as they say in the commercials) Internet access at a truly reasonable cost.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Coppy



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Posts: 2617
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 3:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Coppy wrote:
There are a lot of people in this country that live in such rural areas, they don't have access to DSL OR Cable Internet.

The reason behind this is simple economics; why should the phone or cable company run lines to an area where not enough people will pay to use the service?

It goes back to when Congress mandated that people in rural areas must have phone service and subsidized the running of lines to rural areas. Geez, you people up in McConnellsburg may not have phone service to this day if it wasn't for that. But the argument is that, unlike phone service, the Internet is a luxury and one only afforded to areas where people will pay. Good luck if you ever want to take an online college course or start an online business.

But the copper lines running around here don't necessarily facilitate DSL service and if cable isn't available, you're out of luck.

I strongly believe that broadband Internet service, in this day and age, is an absolute necessity and that ever household should have access to it. If it means the government subsidizing our taxes to make it happen, I would support that 1000%. Imagine how many people could have reasonably priced, broadband (high speed as they say in the commercials) Internet access at a truly reasonable cost for a single day's worth of money spent on the war in Iraq.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Me!!!!!!!!



Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 305

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 4:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Did you know that



Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 14

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 2:57 am Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I heard recently heard about some folks in (Perry county I think) got together and signed petitions to get high speed internet into their small town. I understand that this was just for DSL service (talk about behind the times), but maybe it could be applied in the instance of trying to get fiber optics into the area. I am in exactly the same situation as you.

I have Embarq because I have to have it for high speed internet. I never use my home phone, so basically I am paying ($30+) for the phone and ($24.95) for the internet...that's $60 a month for internet.

I actually just found out that I can't even get comcast. I can only get Kuhncom. Oh boy![/u]

Kuhn cable also offers HIGH SPEED internet!!!!!! Check with them you'd be surprised~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Coppy



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Posts: 2617
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I believe Kuhn is only available to a small number of people in the Shippensburg area. How Comcast hasn't gobbled them up yet is beyond me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cookieclaygirl



Joined: 03 Dec 2007
Posts: 2194
Location: shippensburg

PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Coppy wrote:
I believe Kuhn is only available to a small number of people in the Shippensburg area. How Comcast hasn't gobbled them up yet is beyond me.


amenz, coppy....here's to capitalism! haha! sink or swim, i guess....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BadKarma42



Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 132
Location: Chambersburg aka Little Mexico

PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 3:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Go with DirecTV. Tell them I sent you. PM me for details of this outstanding offer! Twisted Evil
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wile_E



Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 51

PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:41 pm    Post subject: DSL Reply with quote

Off topic, but since when is DSL slower than cable?
_________________
"You know the score pal. If you're not cop, you're little people!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Coppy



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Posts: 2617
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:46 pm    Post subject: Re: DSL Reply with quote

Wile_E wrote:
Off topic, but since when is DSL slower than cable?


Since always. Cable is significantly faster than DSL, although the speed of DSL is directly related to two things; the age and quality of the copper phone lines servicing your home (the older the home, the slower DSL will likely be) and also the distance your home is from the nearest DSL "switching" station.

Cable isn't affected by either of these things, and even at DSL's fastest, cable is usually faster. Not unbelievably faster, but faster nonetheless. In fact, most technology experts agree that DSL is already a dying technology which probably won't exist in any but the most rural areas within about 5 to 10 years.

This is why many phone companies are rushing to invest in fiber cabling that is superior to the copper wires that service your phone.

I can get more technical; for instance, phone cables can transmit data and voice on separate frequencies which is what makes DSL possible. But in rural areas, phone lines are often split which pretty much cuts their capacity in half (and then perhaps split again). The more rural you are, the slower your DSL until you live in an area where it may not be available at all. Verizon is laying fiber cable, but only to well-populated areas at this point. We may never see fiber since we're serviced exclusively by Embarq, but even Embarq is looking into alternative Internet technologies. Areas like this will likely see a wireless service replace DSL in the future.

I should point out that cable internet speeds are affected by the number of users currently on the cable broadband network in your area. I don't think that's as much of a problem around here as in areas with more subscribers, but this is one of the big selling points of DSL in crowded areas.

In theory, if DSL is at its fastest (newer copper wiring; close to switching station; line isn't split) and cable's at it's slowest (many local cable internet users all downloading high definition video at the same time) the DSL would be faster.

When it comes to price, DSL is a more economical option IF and only if you already have landline phone service. If, however, you don't use a landline phone or if you want to switch to VoIP and you get cable television, then cable internet in terms of speed and cost would probably be better option.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
QueenofHearts



Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 379
Location: On the Computer

PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Coppy, you forget to mention that with cable broadband, the more people (subscribers) you have on the internet at one time, the slower you speed will be.

Think of it as a tube. Each person is a piece of spaghetti, every piece that you add in or take out will reflect how much information will filter through that tube. The more spaghetti the more clogged.

Back to the HD. We have DirecTV. (We had had Dish for more that 12 years prior to that with the accesibility of cable.) We didn't like to monoply of the cable companies, the delivery (outages) and the prices; that's why we went with satellite in the first place. The HD is WONDERFUL!

_________________
Some people try to turn back their odometers. Not me, I want people to know 'why' I look this way.

I've traveled a long way and some of the roads weren't paved.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cookieclaygirl



Joined: 03 Dec 2007
Posts: 2194
Location: shippensburg

PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

QueenofHearts wrote:
Coppy, you forget to mention that with cable broadband, the more people (subscribers) you have on the internet at one time, the slower you speed will be.


when i was living in state college, apparently 'everyone' was on cable internet......uber....slooooooow. crashed all the time etc.

i live in ship and have comcast again for cable/internet and am happy with it. pretty fast 'down here'....

i used to have direct but after the divorce got rid of it to consolidate to 1 bill for tv and 'net....it was ok. i do miss tivo but refuse to spend more money...lol...i don't watch enough tv anyway to justify the purchase....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Coppy



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Posts: 2617
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:18 pm    Post subject: Re: DSL Reply with quote

Actually Queen... I did mention this.

Coppy wrote:

I should point out that cable internet speeds are affected by the number of users currently on the cable broadband network in your area. I don't think that's as much of a problem around here as in areas with more subscribers, but this is one of the big selling points of DSL in crowded areas.


No worries, i can understand how you missed it since I practically wrote a book on this.

I really need to work on getting my responses down to a paragraph or two. Razz

I also use Comcast cable where I live, and I have to say, the speeds are pretty impressive. I can tell you with certainty that, at least in this area, cable internet will always be faster than DSL. That may not be the case as more people move into the area, but eventually DSL will be replaced by fiber technology anyway.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Public Opinion Soapbox Forum Index -> Technology All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group. Hosted by phpBB.BizHat.com

Free Web Hosting | Free Forum Hosting | Photo Gallery | FreeMarriage.com

Powered by PhpBB.BizHat.com, setup your forum now!
For Support, visit Forums.BizHat.com