The Public Opinion Soapbox Forum Index The Public Opinion Soapbox
Welcome to the Public Opinion's community message board. You must be registered to post, and all posts are subject to moderation by our staff.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Monday night's debate
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Public Opinion Soapbox Forum Index -> Politics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bobo



Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 173
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:46 pm    Post subject: Monday night's debate Reply with quote

Anyone watch the Democratic debate tonight? Wow. Pretty nasty stuff. What are your thoughts?
_________________
The sun, the moon and the stars would have disappeared long ago... had they happened to be within the reach of predatory human hands. ~Havelock Ellis, The Dance of Life, 1923
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
.45chel



Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 2751
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I did not and if it was nasty, I probably don't want to Sad
_________________
I demand euphoria!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
sassy moose



Joined: 02 Jan 2008
Posts: 250
Location: Virginia

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I caught parts of it at work. The only two things that stuck with me were Obama and Clinton yelling at each other (don't remember what they said) and Edwards saying something along the lines of "there are more than two people in this debate!"

Anyone know what, if anything, was actually discussed?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
.45chel



Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 2751
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I suppose I could tear myself away from my Tivo recordings of Death Note to find out...


Sadly for Edwards, there really are only two people in the race now.
_________________
I demand euphoria!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
.45chel



Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 2751
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bolding below is my own

Quote:
Clinton, Obama Engage in Bitter Debate

By NEDRA PICKLER
Associated Press Writer


MYRTLE BEACH, S.C. (AP) -- Democratic presidential rivals Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama accused each other of repeatedly and deliberately distorting the truth for political gain Monday night in a highly personal, finger-wagging debate that ranged from the war in Iraq to Bill Clinton's role in the campaign.

Obama told the former first lady he was helping unemployed workers on the streets of Chicago when "you were a corporate lawyer sitting on the board at Wal-Mart."

Moments later, Clinton said that she was fighting against misguided Republican policies "when you were practicing law and representing your contributor ... in his slum landlord business in inner city Chicago."

Obama seemed particularly irritated at the former president, whom he accused in absentia of uttering a series of distortions to aid his wife's presidential effort.

"I'm here. He's not," she snapped.

"Well, I can't tell who I'm running against sometimes," Obama countered.

The two rivals, joined by former Sen. John Edwards, debated at close quarters five days before the South Carolina primary - and 15 days before the equivalent of a nationwide primary across 20 states that will go a long way toward settling the battle for the party's nomination.

Hillary Clinton was the national front-runner for months in the race, but Obama won the kickoff Iowa caucuses three weeks ago, knocking her off-stride. She recovered quickly, winning the New Hampshire primary in an upset, and on Saturday, won the popular vote in the Nevada caucuses while Obama won one more delegate than she.

The Democratic electorate in South Carolina is expected to be roughly 50 percent black, an evident advantage for Obama in a historic race that matches a black man against a woman.

Even in the superheated atmosphere of the primary, the statements and exchanges between Clinton and Obama were unusually acrimonious. The debate came as the two campaigns continued to complain about dirty politics and disenfranchisement of voters in last Saturday's Nevada caucuses.

Obama suggested the Clintons were both practicing the kind of political tactics that had alienated voters.

"There's a set of assertions made by Senator Clinton as well as her husband that are not factually accurate," Obama said. "I think that part of what the people are looking for right now is somebody who's going to solve problems and not resort to the same typical politics that we've seen in Washington."

Clinton countered: "I do think that your record and what you say does matter."

Edwards, who badly trails his two rivals, tried to stay above the fray while pleading for equal time.

"Are there three people in this debate, not two?" he asked.

"We have got to understand, this is not about us personally. It is about what we are trying to do for this country," Edwards said to applause from the audience.

Hillary Clinton, who was close with the Walton family, served on the Wal-Mart board from 1986 to 1992. In 2006, her Senate campaign returned $5,000 to the company's political action committee while citing differences with company policies.

A blind trust held by Clinton and her husband, the former president, included stock holdings in Wal-Mart. They liquidated the contents of the blind trust in 2007 because of investments that could pose conflicts of interest or prove embarrassing as she ran for president.

Chicago real estate developer and fast food magnate Antoin "Tony" Rezko was a longtime fundraiser for Obama. Prosecutors have charged him with fraud, attempted extortion and money laundering in what they allege was a scheme to get campaign money and payoffs from firms seeking to do business before two state boards.

Obama's campaign said Saturday it was giving to charities more than $40,000 from donors linked to Rezko. In 2006, when charges against Rezko were made public, Obama gave $11,500 in Rezko contributions to charities.

Often speaking over each other, Obama and Clinton bitterly complained about each other's legislative records. Obama questioned why the New York senator had voted for a bankruptcy bill that she later said she was glad hadn't passed, and Clinton criticized Obama for voting "present" on dozens of occasions while a member of the Illinois legislature.

"Senator Obama, it is very difficult to have a straight-up debate with you because you never take responsibility for any vote," Clinton said to loud boos.

Obama accused Clinton of playing loose with the facts and saying anything to get elected, while Edwards joined Clinton in criticizing Obama for the "present" votes.

"Why would you over 100 times vote present?" Edwards pointedly challenged Obama. "What if I had just not shown up to vote on things that really mattered to this country? It would have been safe for me politically. It would have been the careful and cautious thing to do, but I have a responsibility to take a position even when it has political consequences for me."

Obama said most of his present votes didn't have political consequences but were because of technical or legal concerns.

"Don't question, John, the fact that on issue after issue that is important to the American people, I haven't simply followed, I have lead," Obama said.

"Present" votes are common in the Illinois legislature, and they have the same impact as a "no" vote. Legislators use them for a variety of reasons, from registering doubts about a measure's legality to avoiding a firm position.

Democratic Rep. Jim Clyburn, an influential leader in South Carolina, suggested on Monday that Bill Clinton tone down his rhetoric. Questioned about it, Hillary Clinton said her husband was "a tremendous asset. .. I believe that this campaign is not about our spouses. It is about us. It is about each of us individually."

Obama said he would expect the ex-president to campaign for his wife, but "I have been troubled ... the degree to which my record is not accurately portrayed."

With the holiday honoring the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., as a backdrop, the candidates also addressed questions of racial equality.

Clinton and Edwards compared their records on helping to alleviate poverty, while Obama was asked if he agreed with the famed black novelist Toni Morrison who dubbed Bill Clinton "the first black president."

Obama praised the former president's "affinity" with black people but also drew laughs.

"I would have to investigate more of Bill's dancing abilities and some of this other stuff before I accurately judge whether he was in fact a brother," Obama said.

"I'm sure that can be arranged," Clinton joked.

The debate was sponsored by the Congressional Black Caucus Institute and CNN.

---

Associated Press Writers Beth Fouhy in South Carolina and Christopher Wills in Illinois contributed to this report.

(This version CORRECTS Edwards quote in 24th graf).)


_________________
I demand euphoria!


Last edited by .45chel on Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:48 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
.45chel



Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 2751
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Can I get an AMEN for the Edwards comment and an "Oh Crap" for the rest?


I'm guessing an Obama/Clinton or Clinton/Obama ticket is out of the question at this point.
_________________
I demand euphoria!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Mavis



Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 73

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I watched the debate and didn't find it all that acrimonious, although the candidates certainly were feisty. The back and forth was a true debate instead of the usual blather and rambling answers.

Obama, whom I wanted to like, came across to me as a lightweight with no specifics about anything other than being peeved that the Clintons aren't being nice to him. If he can't take a little heat now....

Again, he mentioned change a lot but he gave no specifics -- just generalities about how no one should live in poverty or be without health care.

He can give a good speech...but where's the substance?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bobo



Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 173
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mavis, I totally agree. I haven't been impressed with Obama in any of the debates, really. He seems to get flustered and strangely, is not very articulate when asked to think on his feet. And last night he was short on specifics, again.

But the thing I found oddest - and the pundits discussed this on TV afterwards - is that Bill Clinton seems to have really gotten under Obama's skin, to the point where Obama seemed fixated on that rather than on articulating his positions on issues.

I am somewhat amused that these guys can dish it out to Sen. Clinton and expect her to take it gracefully, and then they get all defensive and say it's not fair when someone calls them on their records.
_________________
The sun, the moon and the stars would have disappeared long ago... had they happened to be within the reach of predatory human hands. ~Havelock Ellis, The Dance of Life, 1923
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Coppy



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Posts: 2265
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Whoever gets the nod will likely have Edwards as his running mate (and he seems to be campaigning that way as well).

Edwards is the perfect VP choice; a southern Democrat, charismatic, huge support from certain lobby groups.

Then again, he didn't do much for Kerry, but could anything?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mavis



Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 73

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

One of the talking heads on TV tonight suggested that Bill Clinton is acting as a decoy for Obama to chase around, thereby distracting his focus. Looks like it's working that way.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
.45chel



Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 2751
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wish I could put my finger on exactly what it is about Edwards I don't like.
Confused

I've been watching the Topix thread about whether or not America is ready---- as much as I like Hillary, as much hope as Barack gives people, I get this sick feeling that neither one of them has a snowball's chance in Miami.
_________________
I demand euphoria!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Bobo



Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 173
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have that same feeling. The GOP could pull this one out - especially if Clinton and Obama sling enough mud at each other that it turns people off to them completely.
_________________
The sun, the moon and the stars would have disappeared long ago... had they happened to be within the reach of predatory human hands. ~Havelock Ellis, The Dance of Life, 1923
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
.45chel



Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 2751
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gah!
Bobo, How can you stand being in my head all of the time?! Shocked

Though I suppose I could use a translator
_________________
I demand euphoria!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
.45chel



Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 2751
Location: Chambersburg

PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, the first Clinton/Obama only debate is over.

No bickering, which made me happy.

Both of the candidates handled themselves very well, but I have to say it was the best performance I have seen from Barack Obama.

Now it is someone else's turn to post.
_________________
I demand euphoria!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
anonymous_coward



Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Posts: 490

PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i agree obama did really well in my opinion. I liked the civility, but it's so obvious how calculated their behavior is. it's like conditioning animals.

obama was able to bring things back to iraq a little more, which should help him. every other issue they were barely disagreeing on.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Public Opinion Soapbox Forum Index -> Politics All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group. Hosted by phpBB.BizHat.com

Free Web Hosting | Free Forum Hosting | Photo Gallery | FreeMarriage.com

Powered by PhpBB.BizHat.com, setup your forum now!
For Support, visit Forums.BizHat.com