| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Should voters who crossed over be charged? |
| yes |
|
11% |
[ 1 ] |
| no |
|
88% |
[ 8 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 9 |
|
| Author |
Message |
munchkin
Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 235
|
 Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:21 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Coppy wrote: | I noticed you stopped naming your source when it's from an overwhelmingly right-wing biased publication like "Newsmax.org."
Meanwhile, most sane estimations show that Obama has huge support among moderate republicans and independents. It seems that's a much larger reason for his success.... people actually like him. Even some republicans.
I understand why you and your cronies are scared; McCain will have a tough fight against Obama... probably much tougher than against Hillary, especially with all the smear campaign you guys have been cooking up for years in anticipation. |
and the numbers provided by the state. I know you guys do not want to accept the fact Operation Chaos is working, but take a long look at what is happening in your party
Obama is an empty suite. He belongs to a black supremacist, racist church... *still.* So if you're voting for him, you're voting for a racist, plain and simple.
And if we don't vote for him, then we are racist, according to the left
Last edited by munchkin on Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:22 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Coppy
Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Posts: 2615
Location: Chambersburg
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Torgo... Texas was a tie, remember!
Oh, no... that didn't happen in reality.
Riiiight, and Bush beat Gore fair and square.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
munchkin
Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 235
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Coppy wrote: | Torgo... Texas was a tie, remember!
Oh, no... that didn't happen in reality.
Riiiight, and Bush beat Gore fair and square. |
Per the US Constitution he did
Funny how Dems wanted to get of the Electoral College after the 2000 election, then in 2004 they wanted to fight Ohio and use the College to help Kerry |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Torgo
Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Posts: 530
Location: Manos: The Hands of Fate
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| munchkin wrote: | | Torgo wrote: | Sure, reprint the post and premise I just refuted.
Dodo: Our daily date with density. |
Dispute? Where? In your mind only my friend |
The evidence as to what's been refuted and who's the malicious, duplicitous racist dunderhead is now in this thread, for all to see and judge for themselves.
And never make the mistake of thinking I'm your friend. I just gave you the rope to swing from.
_________________
"The Master would not approve..." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Coppy
Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Posts: 2615
Location: Chambersburg
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You take what you can get; c'mon munch, even you have to admit that works both ways.
It's almost as if one side will blame the other for something and turn around and do it themselves. Hmm, funny how only "liberals" do that, isn't it?
Oh wait, no... conservatives do that too. I guess it isn't much worth the time to go into the gerrymandering of republican congressmen or all friendly folks involved with Jack Abramoff.
The only point I'm trying to make is that you should probably stop talking about "liberals" like they're the only thing wrong with politics in America. The scandal pendulum most certainly swings both ways; and for as long as republicans were in power, it swung in their directions far more. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
munchkin
Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 235
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Coppy wrote: | You take what you can get; c'mon munch, even you have to admit that works both ways.
It's almost as if one side will blame the other for something and turn around and do it themselves. Hmm, funny how only "liberals" do that, isn't it?
Oh wait, no... conservatives do that too. I guess it isn't much worth the time to go into the gerrymandering of republican congressmen or all friendly folks involved with Jack Abramoff.
The only point I'm trying to make is that you should probably stop talking about "liberals" like they're the only thing wrong with politics in America. The scandal pendulum most certainly swings both ways; and for as long as republicans were in power, it swung in their directions far more. |
Here are more numbers
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8320
Republicans did keep Hilary alive to drag this fight all the way to Denver
Now go into spin and attack mode guys
Liberals are the problem. Liberals and liberalism do not offer any solutions to the issues facing the country
Just more tax and spend polices, and locking people into a cycle of dependency
McCain is not much better - but not as bad |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Coppy
Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Posts: 2615
Location: Chambersburg
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 9:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I propose theocracy! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
munchkin
Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 235
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Coppy wrote: | | I propose theocracy! |
No, conservatism will set you free form the shackles of dependency and liberalism |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Torgo
Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Posts: 530
Location: Manos: The Hands of Fate
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
At it's root, conservatism represents a fight against change.
How does that set anyone free?
_________________
"The Master would not approve..." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
munchkin
Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 235
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Torgo wrote: | At it's root, conservatism represents a fight against change.
How does that set anyone free? |
Liberalism holds you down, and makes you dependent on others.
Liberalism is bult on lies. It does not help you succeed in life. After more then 40 years and $9 trillion of liberalism, we are told thigs have never been worse
Conservatism does not judge its success by how many people are on government programs. Conservatism judges its success on how many people no longer need government programs |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Torgo
Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Posts: 530
Location: Manos: The Hands of Fate
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
So your assessments of these rival political philosophies are based solely on the welfare concept...
Really, truly astute. A great example of someone who gets all his education from hate radio.
I retract my previous statement, Dodo. Some species truly do deserve extinction.
_________________
"The Master would not approve..." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anonymous_coward
Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Posts: 564
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| munchkin wrote: | | Torgo wrote: | At it's root, conservatism represents a fight against change.
How does that set anyone free? |
Liberalism holds you down, and makes you dependent on others.
Liberalism is bult on lies. It does not help you succeed in life. After more then 40 years and $9 trillion of liberalism, we are told thigs have never been worse
Conservatism does not judge its success by how many people are on government programs. Conservatism judges its success on how many people no longer need government programs |
wow, i didn't realize we had just wrapped up 7 years of liberalism. just how conservative do you want it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anonymous_coward
Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Posts: 564
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Torgo wrote: | At it's root, conservatism represents a fight against change.
How does that set anyone free? |
being intellectual, progressive, continually improving america? no thanks, i'd rather keep everything just like it is and support conservatism |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anonymous_coward
Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Posts: 564
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| munchkin wrote: | | Coppy wrote: | Torgo... Texas was a tie, remember!
Oh, no... that didn't happen in reality.
Riiiight, and Bush beat Gore fair and square. |
Per the US Constitution he did
Funny how Dems wanted to get of the Electoral College after the 2000 election, then in 2004 they wanted to fight Ohio and use the College to help Kerry |
yes, those crazy cons never say one thing when it's politically beneficial, then another when it's not. that's why those reps are all supporting the nuclear option in the senate now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
munchkin
Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 235
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| anonymous_coward wrote: | | munchkin wrote: | | Coppy wrote: | Torgo... Texas was a tie, remember!
Oh, no... that didn't happen in reality.
Riiiight, and Bush beat Gore fair and square. |
Per the US Constitution he did
Funny how Dems wanted to get of the Electoral College after the 2000 election, then in 2004 they wanted to fight Ohio and use the College to help Kerry |
yes, those crazy cons never say one thing when it's politically beneficial, then another when it's not. that's why those reps are all supporting the nuclear option in the senate now. |
Nuclear option over the Electoral College?
Or are you once again changing the subject? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
